Informer
Newsletter of the BCS Information Retrieval Specialist Group
  • Informer Home
  • Issues
    • Autumn 2018
    • Winter 2019
    • Spring 2019
    • Summer 2019
    • Autumn 2019
    • Winter 2020
    • Spring 2020
    • Summer 2020
    • Autumn 2020
    • Winter 2021
    • Spring 2021
    • Summer 2021
    • Autumn 2021
    • Winter 2022
    • Spring 2022
    • Summer 2022
  • Articles by Topic
  • Authors
  • About Informer
Browse: Home / 2012 / November / The Future of Information

The Future of Information

By Tyler Tate on 1st November 2012

The index to Novus Atlas Sinensis by Martino Martini, published in 1655.

Web pages are dead. The future of information—and how people interact with it—is undergoing a profound metamorphosis. Our eulogy must begin long before web pages were conceived. Before the Internet, there was the written word; the book was the preeminent artefact for disseminating and assimilating information.

The Scroll and the Table of Contents

In their early form, books were scrawled on scrolls. Scarcely a format conducive for rapidly jumping from place to place, scrolls were intended to be read linearly. Despite this constraint, the first tables of contents were developed for scroll manuscripts. In the first century A.D., for instance, Pliny the Elder preceded his 37-volume Natural History with a detailed table of contents (Forsythe, 2012). Such tables distilled the contents of a work into a taxonomy of volumes, sections, and chapters so that a reader would not have to scroll through the entire work to find their topic of interest.

The Printing Press and the Index

It wasn’t until the advent of the printing press, however, that the taxonomical organisation of the book—the table of contents—was augmented with a secondary organisational scheme: the index (Wellisch, 1991). Having transformed leafless, handwritten scrolls into mass-market books with numbered pages, the printing press made it practical to create, replicate, and use an alphabetised index of topics. If the reader could not locate their topic of choice in the table of contents, they could look it up in the much more granular index and jump directly to the relevant page in the book.

The Early Internet and the Web Page

The early World Wide Web scarcely advanced this paradigm. The book had become the website, the table of contents had become the website’s navigation, and book pages had simply become web pages. Like the book that preceded it, the early website was a top-down construction: a rigid taxonomy of pages.

Of course, we quickly realised that these one-size-fits-all taxonomies, well, did not always fit everyone’s needs. To fix the problem, we bolted-on inferior site search tools and prepared A-Z indexes of topics. In other words, we did more or less the same thing that we’d been doing for the last five centuries.

The Rise of Faceted Search

But things were about to change. Half a century earlier, an Indian librarian had proposed a new way of organising information. Rather than use a rigid taxonomy, S. R. Ranganathan suggested that information should be categorised using multiple characteristics, what we now call “facets” (Tunkelang, 2009). By the early 2000s, information retrieval systems were beginning to augment keyword searches with faceted navigation.

In this revolutionary development, a person could finally access information not just through someone else’s top-down taxonomy or A-Z index, but by simply interacting with the facets that match their own mental model.

The Pageless Future

But there’s a problem. Because faceted navigation was developed as an extension of search—and search itself was added to websites to provide an alternative to traditional web navigation—these two forms of navigation often still share an awkward co-existence. Users must choose whether to follow the website’s table of contents, or whether to turn to the faceted index.

In the future, this distinction will disappear. There is no need for a user to perform a keyword search in order to access faceted navigation; and there is nothing that traditional navigation accomplishes which faceted navigation does not also achieve. In other words, the table of contents and the index are destined to merge into one, faceted experience.

Indeed, we can see this future unfolding before us. When we use the Web to shop, pick out recipes, look for a house, find a job, or choose a film to watch, we already engage in faceted, pageless interactions.

A Happy Ending

In this faceted future, there are no pages. The story that began millennia ago is finally coming to fruition: information is being liberated from the page—and the taxonomies, the fixed tables of contents—which bound them to a rigid existence. And users, unconstrained by foreign hierarchies, are finally free to explore information in its purest form.

References

  1. Forsythe, G. (2012). History of Information Retrieval. Retrieved from http://www.asindexing.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageID=3300 on Oct 29, 2012.
  2. Wellisch, H. (1991). Indexing from A to Z. Hw Wilson Co.
  3. Tunkelang, D. (2009). Faceted Search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Morgan & Claypool. p7.
About Tyler Tate
Tyler Tate

Tyler Tate is the cofounder of Twigkit—a Cambridge-based software company that provides tools for rapidly building search-based applications. He is also coauthor of Designing the Search Experience, and has written articles for the likes of A List Apart, Boxes & Arrows, UX Matters, and UX Magazine. In the past Tyler led design at Nutshell CRM, designed an enterprise content management system, ran a small design studio, and taught a university course on web design. He blogs at tylertate.com, and tweets as @tylertate.

« Previous Next »

Search

Recent comments

  • Tony Russell-Rose on And finally….from the Editor
  • New Informer – Winter 2021 | Information Interaction on ECIR 2022 and ECIR 2023 – locations confirmed
  • New Informer – Winter 2021 | Information Interaction on Strix Lecture 2020 event – 26 November 2020
  • New Informer – Winter 2021 | Information Interaction on Editorial
  • New Informer – Autumn 2020 | Information Interaction on ECIR 2021 – planning for a virtual conference

Categories

  • Autumn 2022
  • News and alerts
  • ECIR2023
  • Summer 2022
  • Spring 2022
  • IRSG management
  • Winter 2022
  • Autumn 2021
  • ECIR 2022
  • Summer 2021
  • ECIR 2021 Conference Supplement
  • Awards
  • Spring 2021
  • Winter 2021
  • Autumn 2020
  • Summer 2020
  • Spring 2020
  • Winter 2020
  • Autumn 2019
  • Summer 2019
  • Spring 2019
  • Winter 2019
  • Autumn 2018
  • Summer 2018
  • Spring 2018
  • Winter 2018
  • Autumn 2017
  • Summer 2017
  • Spring 2017
  • Winter 2017
  • Autumn 2016
  • Summer 2016
  • Spring 2016
  • Winter 2016
  • Autumn 2015
  • Promotion
  • Summer 2015
  • Spring 2015
  • Winter 2015
  • Autumn 2014
  • Summer 2014
  • Spring 2014
  • Winter 2014
  • Autumn 2013
  • Summer 2013
  • Org Overview
  • Spring 2013
  • Winter 2013
  • Conference Review
  • Feature Article
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Book Review
  • Autumn 2012
  • Summer 2012
  • Spring 2012
  • Winter 2012
  • Uncategorized

Tags

awards BCS Boolean City University clustering conference conferences design ECIR editorial enterprise seach enterprise search events Faceted search facets HCIR information architecture information discovery Information Retrieval information seeking interaction design IR IR practice IRSG log analysis MSR multimedia retrieval navigation recruitment search Search Solutions search strategies sensemaking site search ss12 survey taxonomy text analytics tutorial user experience user study wayfinding web search weka workshop

Authors

  • Agnes Molnar (1)
  • Alberto Purpura (1)
  • Aldo Lipani (1)
  • Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran (1)
  • Allan Hanbury (1)
  • Amit Kumar Jaiswal (1)
  • Andy Macfarlane (50)
  • Benjamin Kille (1)
  • Benno Stein (1)
  • Birger Larsen (1)
  • Carsten Eickhoff (1)
  • Cathal Gurrin (8)
  • Charlie Hull (2)
  • Chris Madge (1)
  • Thomas Mandl (1)
  • Claudia Hauff (1)
  • Colin Wilkie (1)
  • David Elsweiler (1)
  • David Haynes (1)
  • David Maxwell (1)
  • Deirdre Lungley (1)
  • Dennis Aumiller (2)
  • Djoerd Hiemstra (1)
  • Franco Maria Nardini (1)
  • Frank Hopfgartner (13)
  • Gabriel Tanase (1)
  • Gabriella Kazai (5)
  • Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio (1)
  • Haiming Liu (2)
  • Helen Clegg (1)
  • Helen Lippell (1)
  • Iadh Ounis (1)
  • Ingo Frommholz (9)
  • Joao Magalheis (4)
  • Jochen L. Leidner (3)
  • John Tait (7)
  • Jolanta Pietraszko (1)
  • Jon Chamberlain (4)
  • Jose Alberto Equivel (1)
  • Julie Glanville (1)
  • Kamran Abbasi (1)
  • Katherine Allen (3)
  • Kurt Kragh Sørensen (1)
  • Linda Achilles (1)
  • Luca Soldaini (1)
  • Marc Sloan (2)
  • Marco Palomino (2)
  • Marianne Sweeny (1)
  • Marina Santini (1)
  • Markus Schedl (1)
  • Martin White (144)
  • Mateusz Dubiel (1)
  • Michael Oakes (1)
  • Mike Salampasis (1)
  • Mohammad Aliannejadi (1)
  • Morgan Harvey (1)
  • Nandita Tripathi (1)
  • Natasha Chowdory (1)
  • Norbert Fuhr (1)
  • Olivia Foulds (1)
  • Parth Mehta (2)
  • Paul Cleverley (1)
  • Paul Matthews (2)
  • Pedro Ruas (1)
  • Philipp Mayr (1)
  • Roland Roller (1)
  • Roman Kern (1)
  • Ronan Cummins (2)
  • Sam Marshall (1)
  • Samuel Dodson (1)
  • Selina Meyer (1)
  • Silviu Paun (1)
  • Song Chen (1)
  • Stefan Rueger (1)
  • Stephane Goldstein (1)
  • Stephanie Segura Rodas (1)
  • Steven Zimmerman (8)
  • Thanh Vu (1)
  • Tony Russell-Rose (31)
  • Trung Huynh (1)
  • Tu Bui (1)
  • Tyler Tate (8)
  • Udo Kruschwitz (35)
  • Val Gillet (1)

Copyright © 2023 Informer.

Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.